Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Dementia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manthorpe, J.
Right arrow Articles by Eden, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Implications of the Early Recognition of Dementia for Multiprofessional Teamworking

Conflicts and Contradictions in Practitioner Perspectives

Jill Manthorpe

Department of Social Work and Community Health, University of Hull

Steve Iliffe

Department of Primary Care & Population Sciences, RFUCLMS

Alison Eden

Fast4wd Clinical Communications, Oxford

In health and social care in the UK there is increasing emphasis on the need to recognize mental health problems as early as possible, particularly among older people. Both research and policy have identified the difficulties caused by delayed or late awareness of dementia and depression, and the potential benefits of their recognition at earlier stages. This article draws on the output from a series of multidisciplinary dementia workshops to explore the implications of such a shift in practice for interprofessional working. At a time when core specialist mental health teams have been identified as a way forward for dementia care in the UK, this discussion sets out four key bipolar categories derived from the workshops which may be useful in planning, implementing and reviewing the development of services and the drawing of professional responsibilities. These categories are opportunistic recognition versus population screening; referral and responsibility; key working and team working; generalist versus specialist roles. From this discussion we note a further four determinants which in our view need to be addressed in order to promote positive developments in dementia services: learning processes, resource implications, professional capacity and confidence and the impact of new teams on broader systems.

Key Words: dementia • early diagnosis • multiprofessional • primary care • teams

Dementia, Vol. 2, No. 2, 163-179 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1471301203002002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
S. Iliffe, J. Wilcock, and D. Haworth
Obstacles to Shared Care for Patients with Dementia: A qualitative study
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2006; 23(3): 353 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DementiaHome page
S. Iliffe and J. Wilcock
The identification of barriers to the recognition of, and response to, dementia in primary care using a modified focus group approach
Dementia, February 1, 2005; 4(1): 73 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]