Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Dementia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cantley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Steven, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘Feeling the Way’

Understanding How Advocates Work with People with Dementia

Caroline Cantley

Dementia North, Northumbria University, UK, caroline.cantley{at}unn.ac.uk

Kay Steven

Dementia North, Northumbria University, UK, kay.steven{at}unn.ac.uk

Dementia advocacy is a new and evolving field. There is a small, and growing, body of practice-based knowledge about dementia advocacy, but limited research-based evidence about what works and what constitutes good practice. This article draws upon data collected as part of a project on the development of dementia advocacy in the United Kingdom. We explore how those providing dementia advocacy services describe and explain the basis on which they work in the areas of: consent, instruction, representation, and advocacy relationship. We show that although service providers are clear about the principles of advocacy, everyday practice is complex. There are many dilemmas, ambiguities and uncertainties. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for practice, policy and research.

Key Words: advocacy • best interests • consent • empowerment • substituted judgement

Dementia, Vol. 3, No. 2, 127-143 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1471301204042333


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?