Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Dementia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riedijk, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tibben, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) patients living at home and their spousal caregivers compared with institutionalized FTD patients and their spousal caregivers

Which characteristics are associated with in-home care?

Samantha R. Riedijk

Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam,The Netherlands, s.riedijk{at}erasmusmc.nl

Hugo J. Duivenvoorden

Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Iris Van Oostrom

Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen,The Netherlands

Sonia M. Rosso

Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

John Van Swieten

Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Martinus F. Niermeijer

University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Aad Tibben

Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

Patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) need complete care in the final stages of the disease. Some informal caregivers continue the in-home care whereas others institutionalize. This study identifies differences between in-home FTD patients and their caregivers (FTDH) and institutionalized FTD patients (FTDN) and their caregivers. Twelve in-home and 24 institutionalized FTD patients in the final stages of the disease, and their spousal caregivers, were observed. Neuropsychiatric function disorders, dementia duration and severity, burden, mental and physical health, quality of the current and premorbid relationship and caregiver motivation were analysed. The majority of FTDH patients had dementia of shorter duration and showed residual independence. In FTDH patients, neuropsychiatric symptoms were more often present whereas apathy and disinhibition were more intense in FTDN patients. FTDH caregivers felt more emotionally burdened but had better mental health. Caregiver motivations were similarly present in FTDH and FTDN caregivers, while the love-motivated caregivers had worse physical and mental health. Our data suggest that all FTD caregivers could benefit from psychological support. Motivation for caregiving has intervention potential.

Key Words: burden • caregiver motivation • frontotemporal dementia • in-home care

Dementia, Vol. 8, No. 1, 61-77 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1471301208099045
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?